Editorial Policy: Evidence, Conflicts and Corrections

What is the verification rule?

If two public sources disagree on a material spec — licence, APK size, version, game count — we print both and we do not average. If nobody publishes a figure, the cell says not disclosed. That is why the APK page still shows 28 / 43 / 45 MB.

Who can sign a page?

A named editor. Sportsbook copy goes through Arjun Mehta. Payments and install copy goes through Priya Nair. The byline is a link, not a stock photo with a fake regulator title.

How do affiliates sit next to scores?

Every CTA goes through a nofollow sponsored click-out. The disclosure is in the footer and on its own URL. A higher score cannot be purchased. If we stop being able to say that, we change the page before we change the number.

What language is banned?

• Outcome-promise language, match-fixing claims, or cracked-package how-tos.
• A nationwide legality assertion presented as fact.
• Fake seals, fake awards, fake user counters.
• AI-filler openers we already strip in the build audit.

Legal framing lives only on the legal note. Trustpilot complaints are named on is it legit and withdrawal problems, not buried.

How do corrections work?

Email editorial with a URL and a primary source. We change the sentence, bump dateModified, and keep the old error out of the HTML. We do not silent-edit a licence number into existence.

How does this policy meet the test protocol?

Policy says what we may claim. Testing says what we did with a phone and a UTR. A page needs both. The about page is the human version of this document.

On the editorial policy URL we keep one job in view and refuse to turn the page into a second homepage. Readers who need install taps, a feature grid, or a full bonus decode should follow the parent link rather than wait for this file to grow a clone review. Conflicts stay visible even when a single number would rank faster.

Dated figures that appear near editorial policy are observations or labelled illustrations, never a live feed and never a substitute for the operator footer on the day you tap. If two public sources disagree, we print the disagreement. Banned outcome-promise language is a build-time fail, not a vibe.

The audience for editorial policy is a mid-range Android reader who thinks in rupees, funds by UPI, and leaves by IMPS. Copy that would only help a desktop user abroad, or anyone under 18, does not belong on this path. Affiliate money cannot buy a cluster score.

Click-outs from editorial policy still travel through the sponsored nofollow door. An explainer is not "unpaid" because it sits in a subdirectory. The footer disclosure still applies. Corrections need a URL and a primary artefact.

Send a correction for editorial policy with a primary source and we will move the sentence and the dateModified. We will not invent a missing phone number or a missing RTP to make the layout feel finished. Personas are allowed; fake inspector titles are not.

When you finish editorial policy, take one action: open the parent guide, write a rupee cap, or close the phone. Three extra tabs is how a short page becomes another cashier session. The test protocol is the other half of this rule set.

Further reading on this site: homepage review; legitimacy verdict; IMPS payouts; app as a product.